The Federal Court (FC) has upheld the validity of a patent concerning a biologic drug used to treat patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a rare blood disorder, in an infringement action under section 6 of
2024 saw no shortage of headlines in the Canadian pharma space. Here we look back on the year’s most notable legal and regulatory developments and look forward to areas to watch in 2025.
In
The Federal Court (FC) has provided fresh guidance on applying the test for challenging patent-listing eligibility in an infringement action under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations). Granting the delisting motion before it, the
The Federal Court recently refused to order a defendant to produce samples of cell culture because there was no “reasonable possibility” that testing the samples would yield evidence of patent infringement. In pharmaceutical patent cases, testing samples of a defendant’s
On November 28, 2024, the Federal Court updated its guidelines for proceedings under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations) and other complex proceedings. While the changes are not extensive, they create some new obligations and
The Federal Court (FC) has upheld the validity of a patent concerning treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and granted injunctive relief against the generic in an infringement action under section 6 of the Patented Medicines
As you start the new year, allow us to recap 2023’s important legal and regulatory developments for Canadian pharma. We also flag what to watch out for in 2024.
The most significant legal development in 2023 was the introduction of
On December 20, 2023, the Federal Court (Court) published a notice on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in proceedings (Notice) and interim principles and guidelines on the Court’s own use of AI (
On December 4, 2023, the Federal Court held that a patent claiming a formulation of adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat autoimmune diseases, is valid and is being infringed by a biosimilar product. However, the Court refused to issue
In three recent decisions, released in July and August, the Federal Court addressed questions concerning inventors and the “invention story” during Canadian patent litigation. The Court found that: (i) a patentee has no duty to facilitate inventor discovery; (ii) patentee’s