Paul Jorgensen

Subscribe to all posts by Paul Jorgensen

What is a natural health product? Health Canada’s findings upheld by Federal Courts

By Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on November 20, 2023 Posted in Life sciences and healthcare

In recent months, the Federal Courts have twice upheld Health Canada’s findings as to what is, and is not, a natural health product. The Courts’ decisions provide insight into how natural health products are distinguished, under federal law, from cosmetics and from drugs subject to the Food and Drug Regulations. These distinctions are important as … Continue reading

Ontario proposes removing barrier to listing “well-established drugs” on its public formulary

By Julia Won, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on November 5, 2023 Posted in Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On October 19, 2023, the Ontario government proposed regulatory amendments that may eliminate the need to submit certain clinical studies and evidence when requesting that a “well-established drug” be (i) listed or (ii) designated as interchangeable on Ontario’s publicly-funded formulary. The government is seeking feedback on the proposed amendments. Background A manufacturer can apply to … Continue reading

Federal Court: Transferring drug submission does not require re-serving Notice of Allegation

By Pardeep Heir, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on October 22, 2023 Posted in Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court has upheld a decision of the Minister of Health (Minister) that the new owner of a biosimilar new drug submission (NDS) could adopt the notice of allegation (NOA) served by its predecessor. Consequently, the new owner was properly added as a defendant to an on-going action under subsection 6(1) of the Patented … Continue reading

Guidance on inventor discovery and “invention story” evidence in Canadian patent actions: Federal Court rules in favour of patentee

By Pardeep Heir, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on September 19, 2023 Posted in Intellectual property

In three recent decisions, released in July and August, the Federal Court addressed questions concerning inventors and the “invention story” during Canadian patent litigation. The Court found that: (i) a patentee has no duty to facilitate inventor discovery; (ii) patentee’s counsel can object to questions during an inventor examination; and (iii) a patent challenger must … Continue reading

Federal Court finds that Health Canada breached procedural fairness by relying on an undisclosed internal guidance document

By John Greiss, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on September 5, 2023 Posted in Life sciences and healthcare

On August 8, 2023, the Federal Court overturned Health Canada’s decision that a cannabis product, Edison Jolts, was to be classified as edible cannabis and not cannabis extract. The Court found that Health Canada had breached the duty of procedural fairness by relying on a product classification factor in an internal guidance document that Health … Continue reading

Canada implements patent term adjustment as Bill C-47 becomes law

By Kristin Wall, Anna Wilkinson and Paul Jorgensen on June 26, 2023 Posted in Intellectual property, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On June 22, 2023, Canada’s federal government passed legislation (Bill C-47) introducing a system of general patent term adjustment (PTA). The provisions amending the Patent Act to introduce PTA passed without substantive amendment and are scheduled to come into force no later than January 1, 2025. Canada’s new PTA system is intended to compensate patentees … Continue reading

Health Canada releases updated Certificate of Supplementary Protection guidance

By Sarah Pennington, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on May 29, 2023 Posted in Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On May 12, 2023, Health Canada announced the release of an updated version of the Guidance Document: Certificates of Supplementary Protection (CSP Guidance). The CSP Guidance was revised to reflect amendments to the definition of “authorization for sale” in the Certificate of Supplementary Protection Regulations (CSP Regulations) and to reflect changes to Health Canada’s administrative … Continue reading

Bill C-47 introduces patent term adjustment: Proposed term to run concurrently with term of Certificate of Supplementary Protection

By Kristin Wall, Anna Wilkinson and Paul Jorgensen on May 1, 2023 Posted in Intellectual property, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On April 20, 2023, the federal government tabled legislation (Bill C-47) that would amend the Patent Act to bring, for the first time, a system of general patent term adjustment (PTA) into Canada. Canada is required under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) to adopt a PTA system by 2025. The PTA system is intended to … Continue reading

U.S. Trade Representative cites Canada’s “IP problems” including pharmaceutical patent protection

By Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on April 27, 2023 Posted in Intellectual property, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On April 26, 2023, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released its 2023 Special 301 Report on intellectual property. The report keeps Canada on a Watch List of 29 U.S. trading partners that “merit bilateral attention to address underlying IP problems”. The report is the USTR’s annual review of the global state of … Continue reading

Canada announces its first-ever national strategy for drugs for rare diseases

By Sarah Pennington, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on March 27, 2023 Posted in Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On March 22, 2023, Canada’s federal government announced its first-ever National Strategy for Drugs for Rare Diseases, including an investment of up to $1.5 billion over three years to help increase drug access and affordability. Investments made as part of the National Strategy The lion’s share of the federal government’s investment – up to $1.4 … Continue reading

Higher costs awards coming to the Federal Court, including for pharma regulatory and IP disputes

By Chelsea Nimmo, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on February 26, 2023 Posted in Damages, Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

Higher costs awards for Federal Court litigation are on the horizon, with the Canadian government consulting on proposed amendments to the costs structure in the Federal Courts Rules (the Rules). The proposed amendments are intended to increase costs awards by approximately 25%. The current costs regime Under the Rules, the Federal Courts can fix a … Continue reading

Pharma in Brief: The 2022 Year in Review

By William Chalmers, Christopher A. Guerreiro, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on January 25, 2023 Posted in Damages, Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

Does 2022 already seem like a blur? The Pharma in Brief team is here for you with a summary of some of 2022’s most significant legal and regulatory developments in the Canadian pharmaceutical space. We also flag what to watch out for in 2023. The most significant legislative changes concerned the Patent Act and … Continue reading

Health Canada consulting on wide-ranging regulatory amendments for drugs and medical devices

By John Greiss, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on January 19, 2023 Posted in Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

Health Canada has launched a consultation on proposed amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations and Medical Devices Regulations (the Regulatory Amendments). Consultation on the Regulatory Amendments, which have been published in the Canada Gazette, Part 1, is open until March 27, 2023. The Regulatory Amendments build upon the regulatory flexibilities introduced in the Interim … Continue reading

Ontario introduces biosimilar transition policy

By Sarah Pennington, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on January 11, 2023 Posted in Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On December 20, 2022, the government of Ontario announced a new policy to expand the use of biosimilar drugs in the province. Patients receiving coverage under the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program for eight originator biologic drugs will be required to transition to the biosimilar version by December 29, 2023. During the transition period from … Continue reading

Federal Court of Appeal upholds decision invalidating claims to multiple sclerosis treatment regimen

By Paul Jorgensen, Christopher A. Guerreiro and Kristin Wall on August 23, 2022 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has dismissed appeals concerning two actions brought under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), confirming the Federal Court (FC) holding that claims to uses of the molecule fampridine were invalid. The FCA’s decision provides guidance on claims construction and analyzing obviousness, while pointedly refusing to endorse the FC’s … Continue reading

CADTH advisory panel consults on framework for pan-Canadian formulary

By Sarah Pennington, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on February 2, 2022 Posted in Uncategorized

In a recently published discussion paper, an Advisory Panel (the Panel) convened by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) presents a proposed framework for a potential pan-Canadian formulary. The Panel is asking for feedback on the framework with an online questionnaire. The feedback will inform a stakeholder session in spring 2022 … Continue reading

Federal Court of Appeal provides guidance on the “inventive concept”

By Paul Jorgensen and Christopher A. Guerreiro on March 23, 2021 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has held that the “inventive concept” can go beyond the essential elements of the claim and may include advantageous properties stated in the patent’s description. The FCA confirmed that the inventive concept is the end-point in the obviousness analysis: for a claimed invention to be obvious, the gap between … Continue reading

Federal Court finds 45-day limitation period does not apply to s 8.2 PM(NOC) related rights of action for unlisted patents

By Pardeep Heir, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on March 2, 2021 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

Summary The Federal Court has held that the “related right of action” for infringement of unlisted patents under section 8.2 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations) is not subject to the 45-day limitation period familiar to patentees asserting infringement of listed patents under subsection 6(1). Background Merck Canada Inc. and Merck Sharp … Continue reading

Federal Court of Appeal Upholds First Trial Judgment under New PM(NOC) Regulations

By Orestes Pasparakis, Daniel Daniele and Paul Jorgensen on November 18, 2020 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld the first trial judgment under the new Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. In Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FCA 188, the Court dismissed Amgen’s appeal from the Federal Court’s decision declaring certain claims in Amgen’s Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 Patent) invalid for obviousness. The … Continue reading

Two PM(NOC) Actions Dismissed After Common Trial on Validity of Treatment Regimen Patent

By Paul Jorgensen, David Yi and Daniel Daniele on June 1, 2020 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court has dismissed two infringement actions brought against defendants under subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), following a common trial on the validity of Canadian Patent No. 2,562,277 (277 Patent). The Court found that all the asserted claims – to uses for treating multiple sclerosis (MS) – were … Continue reading

First trial judgment under new PMNOC Regulations declares claims to biologic drug invalid

By Orestes Pasparakis, Paul Jorgensen and Daniel Daniele on April 21, 2020 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court has released its first trial judgment in an action brought under the new Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. In Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522, the Court dismissed Amgen’s action and declared certain claims in Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 Patent) invalid for obviousness. The action related to … Continue reading

Federal Court rejects the concept of “first mover advantage” for generics in PM(NOC) infringement actions

By Paul Jorgensen on November 7, 2019 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

The Federal Court has ordered that two additional generic defendants (Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sandoz Canada Inc.) be added to a trial of common issues currently set for Bayer Inc.’s claims against Teva Canada Limited and Apotex Inc. concerning generic versions of XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations). All four … Continue reading

Federal Court grants application under the old PM(NOC) Regulations for a prohibition order regarding a metformin formulation

By Paul Jorgensen and Christopher A. Guerreiro on March 25, 2019 Posted in Intellectual property, Life sciences and healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On March 8, 2019, the Federal Court issued a prohibition order against a generic version of GLUMETZA® (metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets) proposed by Generic Partners Canada Inc. (Generic Partners) in an application under the pre-CETA Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. GLUMETZA® is marketed in Canada by Valeant Canada LP/Valeant Canada SEC (Valeant), which asserted … Continue reading

First motion for early patent dismissal fails to meet high burden under newly-amended PM(NOC) Regulations

By Chelsea Nimmo, Paul Jorgensen and Kristin Wall on July 30, 2018 Posted in Intellectual property, Pharmaceuticals and life sciences

On July 6, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed the first motion brought under section 6.08 of the newly-amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations). The Court’s public reasons were released July 30, 2018. The moving party, Amgen Canada Inc. (Amgen), was seeking an order dismissing the Plaintiffs’ action in respect of two of … Continue reading